|
A 20 minute paper was
presented at Ruskin College in Oxford. More image
links may be added at a later date!
WHAT IS THE POSTER
NOSTALGIA INDUSTRY?
Memorabilia,
objects that remind people of memorable times, people
and events [1], form a major nostalgia
industry. There is a widespread nostalgia industry
around posters, and following are some examples of
material produced by the Imperial
War Museum:
Reproduction posters/postcards,
etc. [Slide]; Playing cards [Slide]; Mugs [Slide];
Keyrings [Slide] Jigsaws [Slide] Chocolate bars,
etc. [Slides]
Among others places
that sell reproduction poster items are the Public
Record Office: Diary pages, where posters are shown
alongside other items such as the Magna Carta. [Show],
the Robert Opie Museum of Advertising & Packaging
and the Past Times shop: T-shirts [Show].
Last year I found
a leaflet aimed at pensioners who needed a 'flu vaccination,
which utilised a comical 'Coughs and Sneezes' poster,
originally used during the war, (We'll see an example
later) and it was obviously expected that such an
image would 'ring bells' with the 'target market'.
The leaflet for 'The
Art of Propaganda' study day at Duxford used a Fougasse
cartoon poster from the Second World War [show] -
out of all the images they could have used, this was
the one that they felt would attract people to the
event.
'Popular' books related
to the war are often heavily illustrated with posters
and advertisements, and front covers of books often
use poster images as they are expected to attract
attention in the way that they originally did. Clark
used one of the most popular posters people remember
from the war: 'Women of Britain'.
Such items would not
be produced unless it was felt that there was a market
for them, so we need to question what it is that attracts
people to such items, when posters were surely intended
as fleeting, ephemeral objects. Not sure we can
answer that in 20-odd minutes, but will try &
raise some issues for discussion.
WHAT IS NOSTALGIA?
But first we need to define
nostalgia. Chase
and Shaw defined three prerequisites for the presence
of nostalgia in a society: a linear and secular view
of time and history (as in Western societies); a sense
that the present is deficient; and the presence of
items from the past [2]. So, how
do we define nostalgia? The Oxford English Dictionary
Online defined nostalgia in the 18th and
19th centuries as
"A form of melancholia
caused by prolonged absence from one's home or
country; severe home-sickness.",
a precursor of the
definition which has become more familiar since the
1920s:
"Regret or sorrowful
longing for the conditions of a past age;
regretful or wistful memory or recall of an earlier
time."[3] or
"A bittersweet
longing for things, persons, or situations of
the past." [4]
But whatever definition
you take, the key is that time and distance safely
separate us from the 'facts', it is the 'ROSE TINTED'
view of the 'GOOD OLD TIMES'. A recent newspaper article
(produced online), described the recent Channel 4
programme in which a British family lived life in
a Victorian style for 3 months. They aptly summed
up nostalgia as "memory's cataracts - clouding our
vision and causing us to see things that were never
there."[5] They described living
the real life as a 'cure' for the longings for the
'good old days'.
ARE POSTERS
STILL REMEMBERED?
In early 1998 I circulated a questionnaire and
one gentleman claimed that wartime posters "were always
in the background to one's thinking."[6]
Wartime posters were designed to meet the need of
the moment, but the slogans and images have lasted
in people's memories. The posters appear to have outlived
their original purpose, and have become reminders
of wartime events, in particular of the 'Blitz spirit',
where the idea that 'a cup of tea will solve it all'
has often become prevalent. However, when I gave a
talk at the '1940s Society', one lady said that she
only recognised 2-3 posters out of the 60-odd images
which I showed them, and my grandfather, born about
1918, and worked in the farming industry during the
war said:
"My mind was on
other things in those days, indeed there was little
time, or inclination to take much interest in
anything but survival. ... Perhaps the fact of
having no real memory of war time politics may
even tell its own story." [7]
So we have to question
whether people are remembering the actual posters
they saw during the war, or simply the ones which
have been popularised since the war. As a respondent
told me in early 1998 when I circulated a questionnaire:
"... it is difficult
to disentangle genuine memories from those enhanced
by reproduced images generating an "Oh! I remember
that" reaction." [8]
as they had
had so much retrospective exposure. But this really
sends us around in a circle, as we still have to question
why they have been popularised since the war.
WHAT
WAS THE ORIGINAL PURPOSE OF A POSTER?
We need to think
about the ORIGINAL purpose of a poster:
All advertisements are designed to arouse a response
in us, and posters were intended to give immediate
visual impact, to be short, sharp and memorable. They
are a form of propaganda, which we can define as:
"The systematic
propagation of information or ideas by an interested
party, especially in a tendentious (prejudiced)
way in order to encourage or instil a particular
attitude or response." [9]
People who responded
to my questionnaire often seemed to have a better
recollection of the slogans than the posters themselves.
Slogans such as 'Coughs
& Sneezes Spread diseases' were one-liners
intended to attract the attention of the public to
an issue, in this case 'careless talk'. We have to
remember that individual posters were not produced
in a vacuum, but were often part of a series, indeed,
part of a wider campaign with newspapers, radio &
film all echoing the same message. Of these, the visual
images used in posters are the most easily memorised:
we tend to remember more of what we see than what
we hear (and even more of what we do)!
POSTERS
AS A REMINDER OF THE PAST
Replies in questionnaires indicated that
people remembered that posters often made them aware
that they were all in it together, of the need to
help each other, and not waste anything. The posters
are a reminder of the past, mythical or otherwise.
'Most old folks can remember a time when beer was
cheaper ... and people had more respect... Most of
us remember odd patches of our lives with especial
affection, sometimes patches that were not in themselves
particularly pleasant.' (Michael Wood, 1974) [10]
Of even more interest is why people of younger generations
also know of many of the posters, or poster slogans.
As an example of that, I thought about why I started
this project - I was born thirty years after the war
ended, but I was taken to the Imperial
War Museum by my mother about ten years ago, and
the most interesting and memorable exhibit for me
were the colourful war posters. When the opportunity
arose for an individual project at history A-level,
I decided to investigate the posters: they had attracted
me had they had the same effect on people at the time?
When I say what my project is, the most obvious, instantaneous
response is "Oh, like 'Your
Country Needs You'", the most famous poster from
the First World War, listed amongst the book The
100 best posters of the century by Campaign,
[a poster production company]. Many also remember
and collect the 'My Goodness, My Guinness' [Show]
advertisements/posters from the war, a campaign which
was started as the independent brewery needed to create
such a demand for their product that non-independent
pubs would have to stock their product. Government
wartime slogans which also surface include 'Careless
Talk Costs Lives', 'Dig
for Victory', and 'Keep
mum, she's not so dumb'. It has been said that
nostalgia involves a personal link with the past in
question, although we do not know of the events
of war, we are close enough to the war, and often
to the people who WERE involved to feel 'involved'
ourselves. There is a knowledge that if events had
turned out differently in the past, our present would
have been affected. [11] The Second
World War is often seen as a defining point in history,
the present had been seen as 'post-war', (although
it is now possibly becoming post-millennial). The
war itself has is perceived as a time when people
pulled together, when there was not such a frenzy
for material objects, more of a shared culture than
a 'me' culture. As an example of this I found a magazine
'Best of British' yesterday about
a couple, in their 30s, who have a passion for the
1940s. "It was a romantic period when people had time
for one another" and "People didn't have much but
made the most of what they did have."
COMMON CULTURAL
CONCEPTS IN POSTERS
Posters contain many 'unconscious messages';
when planning a poster, the poster designer assumes
"that the audience will understand the ad's message
because both communicator and receiver share a common
culture or common frame of reference." [12]
Certain symbols and language are assumed to be shared,
which they generally are, therefore we are able to
read such 'messages'. Any objects from the war are
of interest, but the posters in particular reflect
an idealised view of the past, containing selective,
idealised 'reality' defining 'this is how things should
be/will be'. The idealised poster images presented
are bound up with the general idealised mythology
of the war.
THE ROLE
OF WOMEN DEPICTED IN POSTERS
For instance, women are generally believed
to have taken on many new roles outside the home during
the war. The posters demonstrate the conflict the
Government had with this, initial posters emphasised
the role of women in the home, later posters had to
recognise the non-domestic roles that women took on,
but very few recognised that most women now had a
duel role. For instance, married/older women are often
depicted as housewives [example], or carers for evacuees
[example], whilst it is the younger, single women
who are depicted as war workers [example]. Commercial
advertisers seemed to recognised this duel role earlier,
[example outside office], but post-war the images
of women in their domestic spheres returned 'I'm clocking
in at home' was one slogan. [13]
THE USE
OF POSTERS IN SCHOOLS
As mentioned earlier, my mother took me
to the Imperial War Museum, and most children will
have seen a war poster by the time they finish primary
school. 'The Home Front' is often a popular 'topic',
posters make for colourful illustrations, and they
are something that children can have a go at designing
themselves. The IWM produces several sets containing
reproduction documents for use in schools. [Show]
Posters produced by democratic Britain were fairly
innocuous, they were not particularly offensive, nothing
along the xenophobic lines of the 'beast' [show] poster
produced by the Americans in the First World War,
and are therefore perceived as acceptable for children
to view.
POSTER COLLECTIONS
Posters have been collected for many years: at
the turn of the century there was a particular enthusiasm
for the poster, and there was even a journal 'The
Poster' produced for about 3 years. Posters
were originally collected for their artistic worth,
as described by Miller's Collecting Guide:
"The value of
these is largely dependent on the quality of the
design and commercial appeal of the image. Good
design will invariably hold its value, even if
the poster is by an obscure or anonymous artist.
Also popular are posters showing sports, vintage
cars and fashionable figures, or those that reflect
the mood of their times." [14]
A lot of the value
of a poster still attaches to the importance/fame
of the artist, although by the inter-war years it
was possible for an artist to be more famous for poster
design than for other art work. But, just think, the
Imperial War Museum houses its posters in 'The Art
Department'. Posters are now collected for their importance
as historical documents, and this is due largely to
the widened scope of history over recent decades.
THE LEGITIMATISATION
OF THE VISUAL SOURCE
Forty or fifty years ago a subject such as 'posters'
would not have been considered valid for historical
research. The popularising of 'history from below'
in the 1960s, and the merging of history with other
subjects, in particular the social sciences and anthropology,
has widened the field of historical research greatly,
and has thus widened the range of sources available.
Although visual sources are much more prolific than
written sources, the written word has tended to have
a dominance as a historical source in a culture that
caused Raphael Samuel to comment:
"History, in the
hands of the professional historian, is apt to
present itself as an esoteric form of knowledge.
It fetishizes archive-based research..." [15]
However, visual sources
are more prolific now than they ever were, with the
Internet, etc. Marwick, in 1989, defined 12 'varieties'
of primary source, of which the 6th is
'media of communication and artefacts of popular culture.'
[16] Dependent upon the subject
under investigation, every source has validity for
historical study, provided that it is studied in context,
and that the right questions, such as who produced
it, why did they produce it, etc., are asked of it.
The changing role of ephemeral objects must be taken
into account, for instance, in the last decade the
poster has taken on a new role as, for instance, a
news opportunity for politicians, or a place to make
the 'dot.com' name known.
THE STUDY OF POSTERS
AS HISTORICAL SOURCES
Partly due to the way that posters have been collected
over the years, posters have largely been used by
historians, if at all, for illustrative purposes.
There is a standard joke amongst my friends that I
spend the day sat in Athena staring at posters, and
a frequent reaction is 'how can you write 75,000 words
on PICTURE POSTERS?' These comments at first seem
amusing, but they reveal a deeper worry about the
public perception of history and what it entails.
The project does not study posters as 'pretty pictures'
or graphic objects, but as historical objects. On
the surface they can reveal 'factual' information
about fashions, etc., but of far more interest is
what they can reveal about, for instance, attitudes.
As we saw with the earlier example about women, the
Government faced conflict between its need to recruit
women, and its desire for women to maintain roles
in the home, and posters can reveal much about relations
between the 'advertiser', in this case the state,
and the 'consumer', in this case the general public.
We can discover what the Government felt that the
people needed to do, and if legislative measures are
taken into consideration, we can determine how far
the Government believed people would do what was asked,
or whether they required firmer direction.
THE SUCCESS OF
A POSTER
I did say in my abstract that I would deal with
the issue of how we determine 'the success of a poster',
but this is something that is actually extremely difficult.
If a campaign aimed to have 50,000 people digging
up their allotments by a certain stage, the poster
could be deemed a success if this happened, but the
poster was unlikely to have been the only factor in
a campaign, so we would need to determine what else
was likely to have affected the outcome. Even more
difficult is that many posters seemed determined to
change attitudes, something which is incredibly hard
to measure. Due to the lack of market research at
the time, although records collected by Mass-Observation
and Home Intelligence help in some ways, such facts
are even more difficult to determine sixty-odd years
on.
CONCLUSION
In a western democratic culture there is
a clear distinction between the past and the present,
for many people the future seems uncertain, and they
feel that there is a decline in participation in public
life. Many people therefore feel isolated, and thinking
of a time when people 'drew together' is bound to
inspire nostalgia. Poster collections exist which
serve as reminders of wartime experiences, and therefore
Chase & Shaw's three prerequisites have been met
and help to explain the popularity of poster images
in this day and age, but for the historian it is extremely
important to bear in mind that we need to look beyond
the surface images for what they can tell us about
attitudes then and now.
[1] OED Online Memorabilia
http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry_main/00143910?case_id+ooLh-HsDnDq-591
Accessed 11/04/00
[2] Shaw, M. & Chase, M.,
The Imagined Past, History and Nostalgia, 1989,
p3
[3] OED Online: Nostalgia,
http://dic
/00159815?case_id=ooLh-4S2LPB-589&p=1&d=1&sp=0&qt=1&ct=1&ad=1-
Accessed 11/04/00
[4] Dictionary.com/nostalgia
http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=nostalgia
Accessed 11/04/00
[5] Detroit Free Press Mort
Crim: Look back can be eye-opening http://www.freep.com/voices/columnists/crim3_20000403.htm
3/04/00. Accessed 11/04/00 (they claimed it was BBC)
[6] Weeder, H., Reply to questionnaire,
April, 1998
[7] Letter from R.G. Cross (my grandfather),
21/4/98.
[8] Metcalfe, C., Response to questionnaire,
April 1998
[9] Oxford University Dictionary,
unknown date.
[10] Lowenthal, D., Nostalgia
tells it like it wasnt in Shaw, M. &
Chase, M. The Imagined Past, History and Nostalgia
1989, p 19
[11] Shaw, M. & Chase, M., The
Imagined Past, History and Nostalgia 1989, p 2
[12] Dyer, G., Advertising as
Communication 1982, p13
[13] Dyer, G., Advertising as
Communication, 1982, p52
[14] Gleeson, J., Collecting
Prints & Posters, 1997, p93
[15] Samuel, R., Theatres of
Memory 1994, p3
[16] Marwick, A., Nature of History,
p209. 3rd Ed.
After a paper by Gary Peatling,
we then had a discussion about some of the questions
raised about public history.
|